mailing list archives
RE: [inbox] Re: Re: E-Mail viruses
From: "Aditya, ALD [Aditya Lalit Deshmukh]" <aditya.deshmukh () online gateway technolabs net>
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 16:44:53 +0530
I think the kind of approach Kurt has suggested can only realistically
work in corporate and institutional environments (and with the
occasional well-disciplned individual), where it would also be
realtively easy to further restrict the odds of sustaining damage via
this entry route by only allowing designated users to receive such
content. Further restrictions, such as "it must have the '.ABC'
extension and internally be a RAR archive" could easily be added for
this would not greatly add to security but it would be addeded layer. all the archives have a magic header that will
allow them to be scanned and identified, this is how it works on unix. maybe some thing of that sort is required....
even then how would it solve the prob of encrypted attachments. most archirve formats have an options where the file
names are visible but some like rar have a option to encrypt file name also ie you cannot see the names of the files in
the archive untill you have the password..
Delivered using the Free Personal Edition of Mailtraq (www.mailtraq.com)
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Re: Re: E-Mail viruses Jorge Daza (Mar 08)
Re: E-Mail viruses Incident List Account (Mar 05)
Re: Re: E-Mail viruses Paul Szabo (Mar 06)