Home page logo

fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?
From: Guido van Rooij <guido () gvr org>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:04:01 +0100

On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 12:52:55PM +0100, Daniele Muscetta wrote:
Dave Horsfall said:
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Daniele Muscetta wrote:
....I know, you roughly have some 26 Megabytes of patches to be
installed POST-SP4 and POST IE60SP1 on W2K.
Is any other OS any better lately ?

OpenBSD.  FreeBSD.  NetBSD.  BSD/OS.  See the pattern?

Yes I do.
Even if patching of a BSD box is not something that anybody can do, just
like everyone uses windowsupdate / up2date / yast / apt-get and
...you know what I mean: grab the source code patch / diff file, patch the
code, recompile... and possibly recompile everything that is statically
linked to that component/library....On big server farms this could still be annoying... not to say the
obvious, like I cannot imagine my mum managing being able to do ANYTHING
with such an OS, while she CAN windowsupdate (and she does) :)

FreeBSD has freebsd-update nowadays.


Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]