mailing list archives
RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?
From: "Full-Disclosure" <fd () weevers net>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 09:17:08 +0100
"Geo." <geoincidents () getinfo org> wrote:
... Even the stupid check tools assume you have the thing
on the net
before it's patched.
Yep, yet there are still MS apologists who refuse to open
their eyes so
as to understand that "Microsoft still shows little hint that
In an corporate environment, you will have SUS or SMS running.
If so, no need for internet access.
If you don't have this, just place a firewall on the box, or before the
How hard can this be ? You do it the same way, as you would do before
would patch debian/*bsd/gentoo/ect/ect/ect.
There is no real problem here. Don't blame microsoft if you can't come
up with solutions to simple security "problems".
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
- RE: Re: Microsoft Security, baby steps ?, (continued)