mailing list archives
Re: University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida
From: bkfsec <bkfsec () sdf lonestar org>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 16:41:57 -0500
Paul Schmehl wrote:
I disagree. Until the research is credible and vetted, investigating
is premature. Many people don't seem to understand, investigating
supposed discrepancies in the vote costs millions of dollars. The
recount in Ohio will cost the state $1.5 million. That's money that
could pay for other things. So you don't run off on wild goose chases
just because some "researcher" says, "Oooooo, look at this. This
looks really unusual."
You do realize that some people consider investigation and research to
be connected and that, if there is any implication of a problem (whether
the all-knowing creationist agrees or not) that that problem should be
"looked into" (does that better suit your vocabulary?)....
So, what you're really saying is that you're not willing to back an
investigation until an investigation is done which shows that an
investigation is warranted, correct?
Well, of course you'd believe that! It's politically expediant for you. :)
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.