mailing list archives
Re: University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida
From: st3ng4h <st3ng4h () comcast net>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:17:27 -0600
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 11:48:37PM -0700, Thomas Sutpen wrote:
Any sort of impartiality and vested interest in the actual security of
the whole process that you might have claimed to had was pissed away
in your very first post on the subject. The one where you came out
waving the Kerry flag. Remember?
Similar comments apply to Paul- and if we are to disdain any
discussion based on even a mere hint of partisanship, they apply to
The point, though, is that the discussion is valid and worthwhile
and ought not be silenced. The presidential election is one of the
few official expressions of democracy left open to the populace,
and those who think that that's important will be a little more
paranoid about it, and rightly so. This is one area where I am not
satisfied with a basic assumption that the election is "legitimate
until proven otherwise", and I think you will find many others who
It is my observation that your thinly veiled concern for the process
is merely out of self-interest, if not sour grapes. Your fixation and
continued posting on the subject does nothing to add to your
credibility. And further, it helps perpetuate the stereotype that
liberals are wackos, nut-jobs, conspiracy theorists, and underground
members of the peoples' tin-foil hat militia.
You whine about impartiality and then write this?
Shut up about it, already.
Quite a disturbing message: Just Shut Up and Trust In Your Leaders.
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Re: University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida Jason Coombs (Nov 24)
RE: University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida Banta, Will (Nov 24)
RE: University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida Todd Towles (Nov 25)