mailing list archives
Re: Re: Evidence Mounts that the Vote Was Hacked
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 14:22:18 -0500
On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 09:37:28 EST, Matt.Carpenter () alticor com said:
todays hacker community. But the realities are that we are paranoid enough
to watch access to said systems to avoid at least 99% of local hacking,
eliminating that from feasibility.
At least some of the machines used had active wireless on them - and I'm
pretty sure that they were *not* on the lookout for somebody out in the
parking lot (or *inside* the next building over) with a laptop and
a Pringle's can.
And how, pray tell, do you get "paranoid enough to watch access" to mean
*anything* when we allow the hacker *physical* *access* *AND* be unsupervised
due to the design of the polling booth?