Home page logo
/

fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: Evidence Mounts that the Vote Was Hacked
From: mike lieman <mikelieman () barryscott com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 10:15:58 -0500

Look at the difference between exit polling and actual results.


The election results and exit polls differ, therefore you assume the
election results are wrong? This is really dumb. There are endless
reasons to believe that exit polls are inaccurate. For one thing,
they're self-sampling: they ask you whether you want to participate.

Of all the bad arguments made to claim the election was hacked this is
the easiest to dismiss.

Not so easy to dismiss actually. In this example, wouldn't the drift caused by self-sampling happen in ALL 50 states?

It doesn't.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:2004_us_discrepancy.gif

consider this chart.

Hmmm... Small sample sizes would have shown swings BOTH ways...

Hmmm... Faults in methodology would be seen in ALL the states...

Nope and Nope.

You got any better ideas than "The Election was Hacked"?

I don't.

Damn Nevada and their State Gaming Commission... They show that the Polls DO match the real vote...

Regards,

Mike

P.S. Anon. Cowards who send critical email without valid return addresses for replies are dumbasses...

--
Mike Lieman
Information Technology Director
Barry Scott Insurance Agency

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
AlienVault