mailing list archives
Re: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.
From: marklist () comcast net
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 06:29:04 +0000
marklist () comcast net wrote:
Sorry list, I just couldn't resist......
I couldn't either :-(
*Electoral votes vs. Population 
State Population Votes Votes / M pop.
Alaska 648,818 3 4.624
Wyoming 501,242 3 5.985
Texas 22,118,509 34 1.537
I guess you must have missed that day in elementary
school when they covered this. Pretty simple huh???
Are you happy that a Wyoming voter has 3.89 times the
political power you do????
Next time get your facts together before you post.
It is clear to me that you do not understand the electoral college and
how it is designed. The system is designed to ensure that the people
that live in the US have equal representation. If Wyoming had one person
living in it there would be three electoral votes representing that
person, for good reason.
Each state is given two electoral college votes in the senate and one
for each congress person representing the people based on population.
Before you continue to rant on about representation and how much a vote
is worth I suggest you read a little about how the system works. Once
you have finished reading up on the topic and the issues around a simple
majority rules society I would be interested in hearing your thoughts.
and get the book "Securing Democracy : Why We Have an Electoral College"
Your link did not tell me anything I didn't know already. Many
people, including myself believe that the electoral system is flawed and
outdated. If you believe otherwise, great keep your opinion, but don't
tell me that I don't understand how the system works. The system was
designed with "Majority rules" in mind, they just didn't have the resources
to implement it properly.
IT IS A FACT that people's votes count more or less depending on what
state they live in.
Anyway... I'm sick of this thread already, so if you want to reply, do it
directly and save the rest of the readers from this crap.
Oh yeah, Mr. null () void com: (from ozemail.net)
Received: from smta09.mail.ozemail.net ([22.214.171.124])
by rwcrmxc21.comcast.net (rwcrmxc21) with ESMTP
id <20041113041152r21000uih2e>; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 04:11:52 +0000
Received: from p41700 ([126.96.36.199]) by smta09.mail.ozemail.net
id <20041113041151.OGSQ15593.smta09.mail.ozemail.net () p41700>
for <marklist () comcast net>; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 04:11:51 +0000
Subject: Will you lot PISS OFF?
You have sent the attached unsolicited e-mail to an otherwise GOOD security
NO-ONE outside AMERICA gives a bloody SHIT about the American election crap!
Keep it OFF LIST!
FUCK THE HELL OFF!
OH and in case you twits DONT get it, this reply WASNT to the list! So many
so-called experts cannot even figure THAT out! TWITS!
Get a life dude. Either use a valid address or STFU. No one listens to anyone
hiding behind a false address.
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Re: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. Florian Weimer (Nov 15)
Re: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. KF_lists (Nov 15)
Re: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. marklist (Nov 13)
RE: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. Clairmont, Jan M (Nov 15)
RE: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. Banta, Will (Nov 15)
RE: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. Pursell, Aaron CONTRACTOR (Nov 16)
FW: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. Geo. (Nov 16)
OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. Eric Scher (Nov 16)
Re: FW: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. jpspam (Nov 17)
- Re: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud., (continued)