mailing list archives
Re: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.
From: Paul Schmehl <pauls () utdallas edu>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 12:15:02 -0600
--On Monday, November 15, 2004 05:18:16 PM +0100 Florian Weimer
<fw () deneb enyo de> wrote:
The problem isn't so much the weighting (it's even more extreme in the
senate), but the "the winner gets it all" principle adopted in most
states. This means that both election campaigns do not care a bit
about states like Texas where a ten percent swing in one direction or
the other simply has no net result.
Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Re: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. Florian Weimer (Nov 15)
Re: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. KF_lists (Nov 15)
Re: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. marklist (Nov 13)
RE: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. Clairmont, Jan M (Nov 15)
RE: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. Banta, Will (Nov 15)
RE: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud. Pursell, Aaron CONTRACTOR (Nov 16)
- RE: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud., (continued)