Home page logo
/

fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.
From: Florian Weimer <fw () deneb enyo de>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 20:11:18 +0100

* Paul Schmehl:

--On Monday, November 15, 2004 07:25:58 PM +0100 Florian Weimer 
<fw () deneb enyo de> wrote:

<http://www.sbe.state.va.us/Election/Electoral_College.htm>
<http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_elec.html>
<http://www.spies.com/Forums/showthread.php?threadid=404>

And what's your point?

If you want to understand how the electoral system works, read.  Just 
because you don't understand it doesn't mean it doesn't make sense.

At least one of these documents is factually incorrect.  I fail to see
how procedural details can shed some light on the current strange
effects you are experiencing.

Or do you think that if electors were assigned according to
Hare-Niemeyer, the vote tallying problems would multiply?  The Law of
Large Numbers suggests it's far less likely that they could have
actual election-deciding effect.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]