Home page logo

fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.
From: Paul Schmehl <pauls () utdallas edu>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:29:56 -0600

--On Monday, November 15, 2004 10:32:21 PM +0100 Florian Streck <streck () papafloh de> wrote:

No. The problem with the system is that the relation between the votes a
state has in the presidetial election and the number of inhabitants of
this state differs between the states. So it's possible for a candidate
that has less votes to become president. Even without fraud.

This is not a "problem".  It is the result of a conscious decision.

Wasn't the reason for the Electors that at that time it was not
practicable to make a direct election due to the great distances in

No, it was to avoid the dangers of democracy.

Why stop the people from leraning?

Because this is the wrong forum.

Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member

Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]