mailing list archives
Auditing, Accountablilty, and Elections Fraud.
From: mike lieman <mikelieman () barryscott com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:51:44 -0500
From: "Pursell, Aaron CONTRACTOR" <Aaron.Pursell_Contractor () dtra mil>
Reply-To: nastea () gmail com
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 15:56:20 -0500
to my current knowledge the ONLY talk of any of this is
right here on this message list, I have not seen it on TV, or the news
paper, I see it on websites, that you all keep posting, and I still don't
A good summary with all the important links to evidence can be found here:
And the most curious piece of data is conveyed in this map:
Notice how the variation isn't seen in EVERY State, which would be the
case if the Exit Polls themselves were flawed. They aren't.
Notice how the variation doesn't swing both ways, which would be the
case if Small Samples were the problem. They Don't.
Here's the information summarized as a bar graph.
Here's a NEWSPAPER article...
"For three hours, burdened voters, one after another, offered sworn
testimony about Election Day voter suppression and irregularities that
they believe are threatening democracy."
I don't know WHY the dems are rolling over on this. Perhaps they cut
themselves a deal? Who will ever know?
The IMPORTANT THING is, and *anyone* who disagrees with this *IS*
America's ENEMY, that we can TRUST the SYSTEM used on election day.
And *all* the evidence says we can't.
And *all* the CPA's I work with say we can't.
And *all* the IT people I see from Banking and Finance backgrounds say
Quit crying over your losses, and live on your life. This thread does
Why do YOU hate America, that you DON'T want the system scrutinized, and
Information Technology Director
Barry Scott Insurance Agency
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
- Auditing, Accountablilty, and Elections Fraud. mike lieman (Nov 17)