Home page logo

fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: FW: Shadowcrew Grand Jury Indictment
From: "Todd Towles" <toddtowles () brookshires com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:41:20 -0600

Well, it is given that posting to FD does give a site exposure (good and
bad). But I wouldn't say that FD was the cause of it..it was the illegal
activity that was the cause of it. We all know SCC does some underground
stuff and they post here each time they move. So...I wouldn't blame the
FD list for anything. 

-----Original Message-----
From: n3td3v [mailto:xploitable () gmail com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 10:37 AM
To: Todd Towles; full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: Re: FW: [Full-disclosure] Shadowcrew Grand Jury Indictment

On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 09:26:12 -0600, Todd Towles 
<toddtowles () brookshires com> wrote:
I sent this to n3td3v yesterday. Why look into the news..just go to 
the DOJ website...st8r to the fish's mouth.

Indictment for hundreds of credit cards, UK passports, 
state licenses, 
school IDs, bank accounts...etc..

Are we right in thinking it was the Full-Disclosure list who 
initially brought the shadowcrew site to the attention of the 
intelligence agencies? I was under that impression, where is 
the credit where its due by journalists and authorites?! I 
don't see much mention of "Shadowcrew busted after a thread 
post on a security mailing list about the site". Maybe i've 
got my facts crossed again, but yeah.


Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]