Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Full Disclosure: Re: On Polymorphic Evasion

Re: On Polymorphic Evasion

From: Ali Campbell <fdisclosure_at_alicampbell.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 19:49:19 +0100

Does the fixed-length nature of RISC instructions make detecting a
shellcode on a platform such as PPC via IDS easier ? Or does the larger
availability of pseudo-NOP instructions on these platforms (owing
chiefly to more combinations of registers being available) in fact make
it harder ?

I wrote some shellcode for OS X once, basically as an exercise, and I
caught myself wondering about this.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Received on Oct 02 2004

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]
edgeos