From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of
Hugo van der Kooij
Sent: Friday, October 29, 2004 7:54 AM
To: Full-Disclosure () lists netsys com
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Fw: [Full-disclosure] Joke.cpl ???
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Daniel Bachfeld wrote:
So far we have Bagle AQ, AT, AU, AY and BB for the same worm More
This is the biggest divergence i've seen the last months.
Is there any
reason, why the vendors could not agree on one name? We
CVE-entries and Bugtraq-IDs for vulnerabilities.
So far I noticed at least two distinct files which were
detected as W32/Bable.AP () mm (F-Prot) or Worm.Bagle.AT (ClamAV).
Now I get freash trash Which is decoded as W32/Bagle.AQ () mm
(F-Prot) or Worm.Bagle.AX (ClamAV).
I am under the impression it is not a single infection.
But I share your sense of utter confusion. To which the
people of ClamAV have contributed way too much. (Noticed
I hate duplicates. Just reply to the relevant mailinglist.
hvdkooij () vanderkooij org
Don't meddle in the affairs of magicians,
for they are subtle and quick to anger.
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.