Home page logo
/

fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: [Full-Disclosure] Full-disclosure Posts
From: Mike Barushok <mikehome () kcisp net>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 19:33:51 -0500 (CDT)


I wonder how they handled the Cisco guy whose actual
legal name was 'megazone' (Without the quotes, IIRC).

Or the chinese couple that wanted to name their kid '@'?
(The symbol ususally pronounced as 'at').


On Sat, 16 Oct 2004, yahoo () localhost wrote:

Should Full-Disclosure only allow so-called -real- names? I was on
Nanog (a network admin list) and they have a rule where you can only
post with a first and second name, instead of an alias or nick, to
kind of give more credibility that you are a security professional and
not a hax0r or script kiddie.

Should the same rule be pro actively implemented to Full-Disclosure or
is it a dead duck idea?

I know hax0rs or script kiddies would probably use fake first and
second names if it was implemented, but at least the list would look
neat and a tad more professional?

Feedback welcomed....

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]