|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: bash vulnerability?
From: starwars <nobody () tatooine homelinux net>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 10:21:49 +0200 (CEST)
Wernfried Haas wrote:
assuming you actually meant
:(){ :|:& };: (which can be harmful if no limits are set)?
It should be noted that according to the limits man page, "By default no quotas are imposed on 'root'. In fact,
there is no way to impose limits via this procedure to root-equiv accounts (account with UID 0)."
"ulimit -u 15"
only works temporarily for that user unless issed in a startup script. "echo '* U15' > /etc/limits"
(as root of course) is a permanent solution (root is still unaffected).
-secjunky
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- RE: bash vulnerability?, (continued)
Re: bash vulnerability? Milan 't4c' Berger (Aug 13)
Re: bash vulnerability? starwars (Aug 14)
RE: bash vulnerability? Jay (Aug 15)
|