|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 10:50:54 -0500
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:00:39 +0100, "Nicolas RUFF (lists)" said:
But I would point out something much more important : there are many
more local exploits than remote (on Windows just like any other OS).
Local exploits : about 1-2 a month
* POSIX - OS/2 subsystem exploitation
* Debugging subsystem exploitation (DebPloit)
* 16-bit subsystem exploitation (NTVDM)
* Shatter Attacks
* Etc.
Remote exploits : about once a year
* RPC/DCOM (blaster)
* LSASS (sasser)
Basically, if you are logged in as an unpriviledged user on a Terminal
Server, you can easily become SYSTEM. If this Terminal Server is also a
Domain Controller, game over.
You forgot one important factor - the use of IE and Outlook for the fast
direct-to-customer delivery of local exploits. Which *also* results in
a Game Over....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: [lists] Terminal Server vulnerabilities, (continued)
Re: [lists] Terminal Server vulnerabilities Jonathan Rickman (Jan 26)
Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities Nicolas RUFF (lists) (Jan 27)
- Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 27)
Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities Daniel H. Renner (Jan 24)
RE: Re: Terminal Server vulnerabilities Mark Senior (Jan 25)
|