Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: plz suggest security for DLL functions
From: upb <upbupb () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 17:09:57 +0300

Hi.

Try signing the hash of all your function arguments with a private key
and then in the function calculating the hash and verifying the
signature...
The public key could be extracted from the dll or the dll could be
reverse enginereed to remove the checks but this is still a good
method to prevent totally clueless people from using your dll.

btw MS does something like this :)


On 7/1/05, Gaurav Kumar <gkverma () gmail com> wrote:
friends,

We are developing a software that makes use of a COM DLL. The whole
logic lies in the dll. The User Interface is in VC++. DLL exposes
functions, application calls it and displays result. Now, we found
that anybody can copy the DLL, register it and make use of those
functions.

Please guide us in making those functions secret or encrypted so that
others cannt use our functions.

thanks and regards,
gaurav
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]