Full Disclosure: Re: *****SPAM***** Re: Compromising pictures of Microsoft Internet Explorer!

[Georgi Guninski <guninski () guninski com>]

oh, no. long time no m$ puppies whining publicly.

On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 07:43:32PM +0000, tuytumadre () att net wrote:
> I do not meen to flame you, but you are an irresponsible disgrace to the hacking community. Do you not care about the 
> customer? You never publicly disclose details to a vulnerability of this magnitude. This is an image vulnerability, 
> for crying out loud. What's the first thing they tell you to do when most vulnerability details are released? Disable 
> active scripting. That doesn't work here. What are the innocent, ignorant computer users going to do? Disable images? 
> I think not. You should be ashamed.
i do not mean to flame you, but please stop smoking illegal stuff.

why should lcamtuf care about m$ customers - m$ customers have deal with m$.
it is a problem of m$, not of lcamtuf. does m$ care about free software
customers?

just check the m$ eula on the topic of "responsibility" and see the official
party line of taking responsibility.

what can m$ lusers do?:

- call toll free support and ask what the fuck is going on, asking for a
ticket number.
- switch to a real os.

about secure () m$ - at least technically they are dumb and ignorant from 
personal experience. they don't care about bugs, bugs are a burden for them. 
they care about $$$.

these same lamers continue to whine even if one reports a bug to them, but
doesn't wait long enough for them to scratch their testicles.

-- 
where do you want bill gates to go?











_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/