Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Reverse engineering the Windows TCP stack
From: ADT <synfinatic () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:06:15 -0800

Ok, so how does it behave inconsistently?  Can you give any examples
that we might be able to replicate?

-ADT

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 21:28:45 -0500, Vladamir
<wireless.insecurity () gmail com> wrote:
I never said it incorrectly behaved, I said it inconsistently behaves.

Thierry Zoller wrote:
Dear Vladamir,

V> So if it's BSD's work, and BSD behaves "correctly", why can't Windows?
You still failed to give us any info on how Windows behaves
incorrectly. I may have msised it though
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]