Home page logo
/

fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: OpenServer 5.0.6 OpenServer 5.0.7 : chroot A known exploit can break a chroot prison.
From: "KF (lists)" <kf_lists () digitalmunition com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 14:44:48 -0400

Anyone ever wonder why all their security advisories come out for known issues two years after they have been found?

Anyone ever wonder why they STILL use a vulnerble version of wu ftpd on one of their main servers?

Connected to ftpput.sco.com.
220 artemis FTP server (Version 2.1WU(1)) ready.
Name (ftpput.sco.com:doucheknob):

Move along... nothing to see here but a decrepid OS that no one cares about.
-KF


James Longstreet wrote:

On Wed, 11 May 2005 please_reply_to_security () sco com wrote:
<snip>

Has anyone ever wondered why SCO's mails come from
please_reply_to_security () sco com?  Why not just make them come from
security () sco com?  Or at least set the Reply-To: field?

Other than preventing spam, is there a greater purpose here that I'm
missing?
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/




_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]