Home page logo

fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: Different Claims by ZoneLabs on the "Bypassing PersonalFirewall (Zone Alarm Pro) Using DDE-IPC" issue
From: Paul Laudanski <zx () castlecops com>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 19:54:40 -0400 (EDT)

On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Debasis Mohanty wrote:

Paul Laudanski
What I'm saying is that the vendor never claimed ZAP versions prior to 5
are not vulnerable in the report.  

Funny Paul!! You are simple exaggerating upon the same point again and again
in a new style each time. Well, They don't even say that ZAP versions prior
to v5 are vulnerable in their advisory. 

Glad I made you laugh.  We are at odds in this clearly.  Zone Labs aka
Cisco imvho has issued a fair and accurate release indicating what is not
vulnerable and thereby conversely you know which products are.

To that end... I move on.

Paul Laudanski, Microsoft MVP Windows-Security
CastleCops(SM), http://castlecops.com

Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]