Home page logo
/

fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY
From: "Ian stuart Turnbull" <ian.t7 () hotmail co uk>
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 09:44:00 +0100


succinctly put.we cant all be wrong in that this prick is a moron can we? ayway its fitered now - it didnt get noral. now anything useful it might have to say will be missed. BIG deal now!!

From: "php0t" <very () unprivate com>
To: <full-disclosure () lists grok org uk>
Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 05:35:45 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from lists.grok.org.uk ([195.184.125.51]) by bay0-pamc1-f13.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:36:41 -0800 Received: from lists.grok.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1])by lists.grok.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id F200CC8B;Sat, 1 Apr 2006 04:36:10 +0100 (BST) Received: from felipe.hu (jump.felipe.hu [195.228.157.209])by lists.grok.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC77A07for <full-disclosure () lists grok org uk>;Sat, 1 Apr 2006 04:35:40 +0100 (BST) Received: from DORKA (jangce-2020.adsl.datanet.hu [195.56.20.242])by felipe.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C592E6219for <full-disclosure () lists grok org uk>;Sat, 1 Apr 2006 05:44:42 +0200 (CEST)
X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jGCwSX0I8zVOkzeEBBaSH+UwLHMWBwxHTI=
X-Original-To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
Delivered-To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-BeenThere: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: An unmoderated mailing list for the discussion of security issues<full-disclosure.lists.grok.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.grok.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure>, <mailto:full-disclosure-request () lists grok org uk?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure>
List-Post: <mailto:full-disclosure () lists grok org uk>
List-Help: <mailto:full-disclosure-request () lists grok org uk?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.grok.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/full-disclosure>, <mailto:full-disclosure-request () lists grok org uk?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk
Return-Path: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Apr 2006 03:36:42.0340 (UTC) FILETIME=[7E166240:01C6553D]


  Dear technically challenged netdev,

1) 'Is that the same as...' - ummm... you probably IMAGINED a different
email to which you replied to
2) The address is legit, it isn't 'hacked'. It has a story why I use it
here, but it's not like anybody cares.
3) http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc0821.txt - the world is bigger than gmail
believe it or not.
4) If I sent the email from gmail, it would show in the headers.
5) If it was a spoofed email only used for subscription, the FD posts
sent to it would not get back to me
6) The email in question wasn't even an FD comment, it went straight to
your inbox to avoid bugging others who still don't have you filtered
(like me, until this very email). What did you do? Post it right back to
the list. Nice.

  Sure, everybody can filter, so can I. The thing is, i never NEEDED to,
because there hasn't been anybody dropping such ignorance in my mailbox
so often. I was hoping that you would either turn normal or keep your
word and leave the list.
Since the trolling just goes on, it's grep -v for you, especially after
this stupid bullcrap you made up and decided to share with the probably
not-so-interested list members. I responded this time because 1) it was
a personal attack based on nothing, and 2) because it's my last email
that has the word netdev in it. (sent or received ;]) - and i can keep
my word, unlike 'some people'.

php0t



-----Original Message-----
From: n3td3v [mailto:n3td3v () gmail com]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 11:12 PM
To: php0t; full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO
SERIOUSLY


Is that the same as hacking someones "domain", accepting the Gmail
confirmation to say you're allowed to send from a Gmail account with
that hacked domain, then delete all forensic logs from the hacked domain
and then go back to your Gmail account, where you can continue to send
your inflamed FD comments from as very () hackeddomain com  Figures.


On 3/31/06, php0t <very () unprivate com> wrote:

If you kept your word (and didn't post my emails back to the list), it'd
be better. :)


-----Original Message-----
From: n3td3v [mailto: n3td3v () gmail com <mailto:n3td3v () gmail com> ]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 10:47 PM
To: php0t; full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
<mailto:full-disclosure () lists grok org uk>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO
SERIOUSLY


Why don't you just "filter" me like "the experts" have told you to do?
Or haven't you worked out the technical background architecture of
Outlook and Thunderbird yet? Figures.


On 3/31/06, php0t <very () unprivate com> wrote:

For real, please keep your word.



-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk
<mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk> ] On Behalf Of n3td3v
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 9:55 PM
To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
<mailto:full-disclosure () lists grok org uk>
Subject: [Full-disclosure] Re: RSA HAVE CRACKED PHISHING, NO SERIOUSLY


This is funny as well, http://news.com.com/5208-1029-0.html?forumID=1
<http://news.com.com/5208-1029-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=15591&messageID
=131539&start=-1&reply=true>
&threadID=15591&messageID=131539&start=-1&reply=true  I almost choked on
my big mac after reading this one, the guy thinks if you take down a
site, the phisher's script doesn't deploy another premade site straight
away on another host. lol, maybe the RSA have miscalculated the pre
plainning and programming of a phishing attack backend before its
carried out. I guess they just thought phishing was down to "dumb
criminals".


On 3/31/06, n3td3v <n3td3v () gmail com> wrote:

Check out this article, and I really did spill my hard earned Starbucks
right down my front when I looked at this article:
http://news.com.com/5208-1029-0.html?forumID=1
<http://news.com.com/5208-1029-0.html?forumID=1&threadID=15591&messageID
=131433&start=-1> &threadID=15591&messageID=131433&start=-1



_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/






_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_________________________________________________________________
Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free newsletters! http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]