From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
To: Ian stuart Turnbull <ian.t7 () hotmail co uk>
CC: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Shell accounts Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006
Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([220.127.116.11]) by
bay0-pamc1-f9.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue,
11 Apr 2006 15:42:31 -0700
Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])by
turing-police.cc.vt.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k3BMgRTB025995;Tue,
11 Apr 2006 18:42:27 -0400
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.1-RC3
References: <BAY112-F227EBD62579F66106468D299CD0 () phx gbl>
Return-Path: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Apr 2006 22:42:31.0805 (UTC)
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 23:26:24 BST, Ian stuart Turnbull said:
> Suppose I had a friend who had a Linux connected to the internet and I
> him to set me up a username. As long as his machine didn't do any
> [and he pretended not to know of anyone using this account] would I -
> sssh to connect] be traceable.
The real question at that point is - "If the cops come banging on your
door and wave warrants and subpoenas and cattle prods in his face, how
will he fold?"
Either he caves or he doesn't. If he caves, you're not anonymous anymore.
doesn't, you're a moral sleezeball for making him take the heat when he's
of friend that would take the heat for you.