Home page logo
/

fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: Recall: Oracle read-only user caninsert/update/delete data
From: "William Lefkovics" <william () lefkovics net>
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 19:50:11 -0700

 
It doesn't.  It's a client-side function.


-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] On Behalf Of Brian Eaton
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:34 PM
To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Recall: Oracle read-only user
caninsert/update/delete data

On 4/13/06, Michael Holstein <michael.holstein () csuohio edu> wrote:
In my experience, it doesn't even work in an Exchange environment. 
The user gets a message that the message should be recalled, but the 
original is still there, even if it hasn't been read yet. I've heard 
people say that at one time it would auto-delete the message if it 
hadn't been read, but I've never seen that.

It does, provided you read the "recall" message first -- but since 
Outlook (by default) displays in reverse chronological order, and most 
people read email in the order received, it does little good.

Anybody understand how MS Exchange implements the "recall"
functionality?  I could see nothing in the e-mail headers that appeared to
prove the sender of the original message was the sender of the recall
request.

- Brian

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]