On 01 Dec 2006 09:36:58 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn_at_stonehenge.com> wrote:
> >>>>> "Dude" == Dude VanWinkle <dudevanwinkle_at_gmail.com> writes:
>
> Dude> On 01 Dec 2006 08:54:23 -0800, Randal L. Schwartz <merlyn_at_stonehenge.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> If there's caselaw in Georgia, that's useful for Georgia, but
> >> certainly isn't referencable in the 49 other states.
>
> Dude> actually, it is. it is called legal precedence
>
> It wasn't clear from your posting that you were talking about a federal case.
well try reading the material I reference before saying that anyone
who listens to me is a fool next time plz.
> In that case, yes, it's caselaw. However, if it was just Georgia state law,
> that would *not* create case law for any other state.
>
> By the way, "caselaw" and "legal precedent" are the same.
thanks for the info, i learned something new today, which makes it a good day.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Received on Dec 01 2006
Intro
