mailing list archives
Re: what we REALLY learned from WMF
From: Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 02:12:53 +0200
Adrian Marsden wrote:
This is a silly post.... What are you trying to prove? That in some cases a company can test a patch quicker than in
MS understood the issue, promised a fix on their scheduled date and did better than expected.... So you criticise
Way to go.... Make it so they can never win.... then they won't bother... and we all know who suffers then....
I may chose MS as an example that companies CAN do better. I believe
this "fluke" gave us the perfect example of how security incidents
should be handled.
Why should we now settle for less?
Naturally, each problem has its own issues and time demands. That
doesn't change the fact of the matter.
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Re: Re: what we REALLY learned from WMF, (continued)