mailing list archives
Re: Re: Session data pollution vulnerabilities inweb applications
From: Frank Knobbe <frank () knobbe us>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:30:25 -0600
On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 19:18 +0000, Dave Korn wrote:
Yes he is. He's polluting sanitized data with tainted data. It's a
fairly reasonable description if you ask me.
I didn't see any sanitized data. It's a POST input, not something clean
NO! You've /completely/ failed to understand the post.
The underlying issue is not that the user-supplied data is trusted,
because it isn't, it gets validated.
Where did that happen? I haven't seen a validation in his example.
The _underlying_ issue is that the
*same* location is used to store both trusted and non-trusted data, and
there's no way for the application to know which kind of data was last
stored in that location.
You're not telling me that $_POST['login'] is trusted data, are you?
It is said that the Internet is a public utility. As such, it is best
compared to a sewer. A big, fat pipe with a bunch of crap sloshing
against your ports.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/