Home page logo
/

fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: Unofficial Microsoft patches help hackers, not security
From: "Christopher Carpenter" <ccarpenter () dswa net>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 11:58:35 -0700

 

 

________________________________

From: full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces () lists grok org uk] On Behalf Of Joe
Average
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 11:50 AM
To: Niek; full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Unofficial Microsoft patches help
hackers,not security

 

From my blog:

 

""[Unofficial patches are available, as is a leaked official patch]
[Unofficial patches are merely used by hackers as a tool to patch
machines they've compromised, to stop other hackers hacking the same
machine, although the machine is still accessable to the hacker.] [The
consumer goes along to Windows Update on Tuesday and doesn't think they
need a patch, because Microsoft tells them its not needed. Little does
the consumer know their machine was patched by a hacker, who now has
control over their computer network.]"" 

 

It means the unofficial patch is as harmful as the vulnerability and
exploit code its self.



------------snip------------------

 

While this might be the case with binary-only patches, the patch
released by Ilfak Guilfanov comes with the source.  Review it and
compile it yourself if you are concerned.

 

Chris

 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]