Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: scanning
From: schanulleke.29172787 () bloglines com
Date: 12 Jun 2006 09:23:51 -0000

--- Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
What's this mean? It means that if you
scan some lame-ass system and it
crashes as a result, you might be in deep
shit.  And "it shouldn't have
crashed from a portscan" does *not* hold
up in court.

Having done pen-testing in the past I have disabled (dos-ed)
systems and entire networks with a portscan.

My employer would never let
me do any work withaout a prior written agreement.

However, law is highly
fluctuate over time and from country to country. Dutch law recently changed.
In the past you had to have broken a security barrier in order to be accused
of hacking, now it has changed to "with the intent to  do harm".

Is it
illegal? Not enough data to compute / that is one for the lawers...
Is it
unwise? Probably...
Will you get cought/sued? Unlikely...
Would I bother
to sue you? No...

Schanulleke

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]