|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code
From: Pavel Kankovsky <peak () argo troja mff cuni cz>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:55:50 +0200 (MET DST)
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006, Brian Eaton wrote:
I wasn't sure if Windows actually supported mandatory access controls,
so I poked around on Microsoft's web site a bit. Yes, Windows
supports MAC.
MS Windows does not support MAC. Its future version (i.e. Vista) might
support some half-baked (*) pseudo-MAC.
(*) Where's the *-property? Everything I see is the ss-property. Any
idiot can implement a lame wannabe pseudo-MAC lacking the *-property
but such a thing cannot be the true mandatory access control, it'd be
mere DAC on steroids!
In his original note, Dinis raised a good point: even a restricted
browser has access to all kinds of sensitive personal information,
such as passwords to web sites. MAC would not prevent an exploit from
stealing that kind of data.
Nonsense. MAC was invented by soldiers and spooks to protect
confidentiality. (The use of MAC to protect integrity is, in fact, an
afterthought.)
Properly implemented and configured MAC can prevent the leakage of
confidential (i.e. sensitive personal) information to (unauthorized) web
sites.
--Pavel Kankovsky aka Peak [ Boycott Microsoft--http://www.vcnet.com/bms ]
"Resistance is futile. Open your source code and prepare for assimilation."
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: Re: [Owasp-dotnet] RE: 4 Questions: Latest IEvulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code, (continued)
Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Brian Eaton (Mar 25)
- Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Pilon Mntry (Mar 26)
- Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Christopher Bergström (Mar 27)
- Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Brian Eaton (Mar 27)
- Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Pavel Kankovsky (Mar 27)
- Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Brian Eaton (Mar 27)
- Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Pavel Kankovsky (Mar 28)
- Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Brian Eaton (Mar 29)
Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 25)
Re: 4 Questions: Latest IE vulnerability, Firefox vs IE security, User vs Admin risk profile, and browsers coded in 100% Managed Verifiable code Pavel Kankovsky (Mar 27)
|