|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: Re: recursive DNS servers DDoS as a growing DDoSproblem
From: Måns Nilsson <mansaxel () sunet se>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 23:54:45 +0100
--On den 8 mars 2006 14.58.20 -0500 gboyce <gboyce () badbelly com> wrote:
On Wed, 8 Mar 2006, Security Lists wrote:
Sorry, I don't see this as amplification in your example, because YOUR
dns servers are 100% of the traffic. 1:1 ratio.
Once the first request to the nameservers is made, the object should be
cached by the nameservers. Instead of one packet to each server,
consider a stream of packets to each server. The recipient will recieve
a stream of 100K answers with likely only 200K of traffic back to the
attackers DNS server.
Now, the proper way to exploit this is to craft a record in a zone you
control, that is some 4 kibibytes large, and have the spoofed query use
EDNS0 (RFC2671) and advertise a willingness to receive such a large
message. Much better payback.
This is not anything artificial, it is based on actual attacks. Go and
restrict your recursing name servers to answering queries from your own
networks -- we are now, and this makes me sad, at a point where SMTP was
1994-5, open relays were at times regarded as a good utility. No such thing
today, and I think DNS will take the same route.
Do this limitation soon, but with care and afterthought, so as not to
create a walled garden. What we do not want is packet filters as a panic
measure. We want the end nodes to be sturdy in themselves. Like other
spoofing attack countermeasures, this is a measure that will protect your
neighbours more than yourselves, so do it for the good of others.
--
Måns Nilsson Systems Specialist
+46 70 681 7204 cell KTHNOC
+46 8 790 6518 office MN1334-RIPE
Hello. I know the divorce rate among unmarried Catholic Alaskan
females!!
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
|