|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: MD5 algorithm considered toxic (and harmful)
From: Tim <tim-security () sentinelchicken org>
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 14:20:21 -0500
because they perform risk-analysis:
- what are the threats to my assets?
- which role does MD5 play there?
- any subsequent risk then from using it?
- high priority risk? mitigating controls or risk acceptance?
Don't kid yourself. Very few businesses in my experience think about
this stuff when they go to use a hash. Most just use whatever hash
they're used to using. I rarely see clients actually sitting down and
thinking about what the application of a given hash is and what the
threats are in their specific case.
would you be so kind to show me a real-world attack against a VPN
using MD5 hashing? ...
Assuming there are no real-world attacks against your particular VPN
that uses MD5, does that make it safe for the rest of us in any given
application? A rather leading question IMO.
tim
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
Re: MD5 algorithm considered toxic (and harmful) coderman (Dec 01)
Re: MD5 algorithm considered toxic (and harmful) Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 01)
|