Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Signature or checksum?
From: "Kristian Erik Hermansen" <kristian.hermansen () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 08:10:22 -0500

On Dec 2, 2007 7:00 AM,  coderman <coderman () gmail com> wrote:
p.s.  for the tin foil hat crowd, those digital sigs are looking
weaker every year compared to cryptographic hash functions and block
ciphers:

http://dwave.wordpress.com/2007/11/26/slides-from-sc07-progress-in-quantum-computing-panel/

not to mention GNFS improvements the last few years...

Don't forget Galois group and Fermat surface research :-P
-- 
Kristian Erik Hermansen
"I have no special talent. I am only passionately curious."

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/


  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
  • Re: Signature or checksum? Kristian Erik Hermansen (Dec 02)
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]