Full Disclosure: Re: You shady bastards.

["Dude VanWinkle" <dudevanwinkle () gmail com>]

On 6/6/07, Larry Seltzer <Larry () larryseltzer com> wrote:
> Why would this be offensive? It's a company address. Someone might send
> e-mail containing company business to the address.
Would you feel the same way if it was a voicemail left on his machine?
What about a postal letter addressed to the person?

All are means of communication, although vastly differing laws pertain
to each. I have always found this confusing. Why should the method I
use to convey personal messages be treated with such amazing leaps in
the levels of expected privacy?

Snail mail, (PSTN/GSM/mostVOIP)telephone calls, and emails are all
sent unencrypted (unless you consider the envelope a form of
encryption) IMO if you disagree with the companies rights to
open/listen to one form of communication, you should disagree with the
all of them.

-JP<who thinks its not only in bad taste, but shiesty to boot>

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/