Home page logo

fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Python 2.5 (Modules/zlib) minigzip local buffer overflow vulnerability
From: Alejandro Barrera <abarrera () iron-gate net>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 02:01:29 +0100

Thus, replacing strcpy(3) calls with strncpy(3) can have definite
impacts on performance.

But the question is how big impact? Its a security/speed trade-off.

That depends on your actual code. It's not a security/speed trade-off, it's a

If you care about security AND speed then you use strcpy() correctly, if 
you're a lazy bastard and don't care about speed, then use strncpy().

Anyway, usually you should fill the whole buffer, so if you know how to code, 
it shouldn't have a big impact. *BUT* if you're one of those lazy guys that 
just allocate a 1024 char buffer to copy 32 char strings then you have worse 
problems than security.


Alejandro Barrera García-Orea
R&D Engineer
c/ Alcala 268 28027 Madrid
Office: +34 91 326 66 11
Fax: +34 91 326 66 11
e-mail: abarrera () iron-gate net

Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]