|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: full-disclosure () hushmail com
From: phioust <phioust () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 23:28:31 -0500
Please do not bring up non-technical things that even the random user can
comment on. These actions have been known to make people like gadi evron and
valdis post random non-sense and fill my inbox.[1][2][3][4][5][6]
[1] http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog-futures/msg01386.html
[2] http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog-futures/msg01385.html
[3] http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog-futures/msg01402.html
[4] http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=119030476022347&w=2
[5] http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=119075756905837&w=2 <-- key example
[6] http://marc.info/?l=pen-test&m=118902465322862&w=2 <-- another key
example
On 10/14/07, gjgowey () tmo blackberry net <gjgowey () tmo blackberry net> wrote:
I wonder if I can start billing for the waste of storage space and time
that these stupid emails are causing me. I know it has been proposed to
bill spammers before.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
- Re: full-disclosure () hushmail com, (continued)
Re: full-disclosure () hushmail com Dude VanWinkle (Oct 14)
Re: full-disclosure () hushmail com crazy frog crazy frog (Oct 15)
Re: full-disclosure () hushmail com full-disclosure (Oct 14)
|