I asked you to stop your bullshit you mad man. It is crazy to see
so
many anonymous IDs talking to each other and spamming the whole
list.
On 9/28/07, worried security <worriedsecurity () googlemail com>
wrote:
On 9/28/07, Troy <gimmespam () gmail com> wrote:
Wouldn't UDV be more appropriate, for unpatched disclosed
vulnerability?
The "R" in RDV means recent. I wouldn't consider a two-month
old, but still
unpatched, vulnerability to be recent, so I wouldn't really be
able to call
it an RDV. I would, however, be able to call it a UDV.
Another option would be EDV, for exploitable disclosed
vulnerability, or
even just UV or EV. Why do we need to bring up the point that
it's
disclosed? How could we be discussing an undisclosed
vulnerability?
Two months is still recently. Think about "In recent history we
invaded
Iraq", "In recent times terrorism has become more prominent".
Five, Ten years can still be classed as recently. Two months, no
problem.
Dude, I sat for hours thinking up RDV, give me some credit ;)
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter:
http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/