Full Disclosure: Re: Fwd: n3td3v has a fan

["G. D. Fuego" <gdfuego () gmail com>]

On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 12:56 PM, n3td3v <xploitable () gmail com> wrote:

> Security Threater: reader comment from n3td3v
>
> Posted on: April 10, 2008, 9:17 AM PDT
> Story: Bruce Schneier's new view on Security Theater
>
> Security threater is good because it scares potential terrorists from
> being caught. It keeps the terrorists on their toes and worrying all
> the time. You've got to have security threater in place to deter
> terrorists or people thinking about it, or in the middle of plotting
> it.
Do you understand the point of terrorism?  The end goal is not to kill
people.  There are plenty of more effective methods to kill people than
they've been using.  No, the end goal is to cause TERROR.  They want us to
be afraid to live our lives.

Security Theater does more to cause terror in the minds of the people than
it does to deter terrorists from committing these crimes.  People in the US
are starting to believe its reasonable to prevent tourists from taking
pictures from a moving train.  As though taking these photos are somehow
going to threaten our lives.

How does this help?

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/