mailing list archives
Re: lots of connections to 188.8.131.52 port 80
From: "Joey Mengele" <joey.mengele () hushmail com>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:22:43 -0400
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:11:53 -0400 news () dmcdonald net wrote:
Eh? The closest thing I can think of to what you're saying is if
of a DDOS was stored XSS on a popular site(s) being used get users
browsers to request information from 184.108.40.206. The XSS would
else where, and the DDOS attack itself would contain no 'payload'.
That is exactly what I am saying, thank you for clarifying for the
others. Sometimes I am not as articulate as I would like to be.
In which case filtering user input on his side isnt going to
Actually, it is going to anything, if done properly.
Plus, you still have no reason for calling this a textbool case of
anything else for that matter. Without seeing the tcpdump, all we
is reel of a list of things in might be.
Your logic is not correct here. Please rethink this statement.
Amazing cruises. Click here to find great deals.
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
- Re: lots of connections to 220.127.116.11 port 80, (continued)