Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Full Disclosure: Re: Exploring the UNKNOWN: Scanning the Internet via SNMP!

Re: Exploring the UNKNOWN: Scanning the Internet via SNMP!

From: <Valdis.Kletnieks_at_vt.edu>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:24:15 -0500

On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 09:13:05 EST, Static Rez said:

> Isn't it true that a TCP packet is typically 20 bytes, and a UDP packet
> about 8? This is minus any additional data that has been added to the
> packet. If this is true, then depending on the size of the pipe your sending
> the data through, and the amount of congestion there might be, a UDP packet
> would more easily and quickly hit its destination.

If your network is so congested that the difference between a min-sized TCP
packet and a min-sized UDP packet matters, you have *bigger* problems...

(In reality, most NICs will refuse to blat out a packet much smaller than
64 bytes or so - there was a number of info-disclosure issues with some
drivers that would try to send a 56 byte packet, and failed to zero out the
8 trailing bytes).

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Mar 06 2008
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]