Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:




fulldisclosure logo Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Exploring the UNKNOWN: Scanning the Internet via SNMP!
From: Dmitry <security.research.labs () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:15:55 +0200

dude,  you don't need the entire handshake for tcp scanning.

On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Andrew A <gluttony () gmail com> wrote:

hey dude, how is merely sending a single datagram not going to be faster
than doing an entire handshake?

On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Sebastian Krahmer <krahmer () suse de>
wrote:

This is not true. I doubt there is any measurable advantage
of UDP vs. TCP scans if you do it right.



_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

  By Date           By Thread  

Current thread:
[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]