|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: Chinese backdoors "hidden in router firmware"
From: "Jerome Jar" <iusr.jar () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 13:29:06 +0800
OK, only if hidden backdoors are also part of their function specs...
I have friends in a router manufacturer. Besides basic functionalities
that a router must have, they usually have to deal with some
ridiculous requirements from customers. Mmmm, I also start to suspect
the customers *want* their backdoors ;-)
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:28 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu> wrote:
On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 11:38:27 +0800, Jerome Jar said:
> Come on, where are the evidences? Sounds pretty much like racialism.
>
> Usually the engineers are having a hard time on even getting the
> routers and switches functional for mass market; there won't be any
> time left for them to plant well hidden backdoors.
But that's the proof right there - the reason *why* they have so much
trouble getting the damned things to work is because they have to work
around the backdoors in the device... ;)
--
"Houston, we have a problem."
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
Re: Chinese backdoors "hidden in router firmware" Jerome Jar (Mar 06)
Re: Chinese backdoors "hidden in router firmware" chedder1 (Mar 06)
Re: Chinese backdoors "hidden in router firmware" Julio Cesar Fort (Mar 06)
|