Nmap Security Scanner
*Intro
*Ref Guide
*Install Guide
*Download
*Changelog
*Book
*Docs
Security Lists
*Nmap Hackers
*Nmap Dev
*Bugtraq
*Full Disclosure
*Pen Test
*Basics
*More
Security Tools
*Pass crackers
*Sniffers
*Vuln Scanners
*Web scanners
*Wireless
*Exploitation
*Packet crafters
*More
Site News
Site Search:
Exploit World
Advertising
About/Contact
Credits
Sponsors:
edgeos



Full Disclosure: Re: defining 0day

Re: defining 0day

From: Douglas K. Fischer <fischerdk_at_fidoki.com>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 15:10:00 -0400

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] defining 0day
From: n3td3v <xploitable_at_gmail.com>
To: Gadi Evron <ge_at_linuxbox.org>, full-disclosure_at_lists.grok.org.uk,
n3td3v <n3td3v_at_googlegroups.com>
Date: 04/19/2008 18:44
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 8:02 PM, Gadi Evron <ge_at_linuxbox.org> wrote:
>
>> Okay. I think we exhausted the different views, and maybe we are now able
>> to come to a conlusion on what we WANT 0day to mean.
>>
>> What do you, as professional, believe 0day should mean, regardless of
>> previous definitions?
>>
>> Obviously, the term has become charged in the past couple of years with the
>> targeted office vulnerabilities attacks, WMF, ANI, etc.
>>
>> We require a term to address these, just as much as we do "unpatched
>> vulnerability" or "fully disclosed vulnerability".
>>
>> What other such descriptions should we consider before proceeding?
>> non-disclosure?
>>
>> Gadi.
>>
>>
>
> I just caught a news article that summed up nicely what 0day means...
>
> "A zero-day flaw is a software vulnerability that has become public
> knowledge but for which no patch is available. It is particularly
> dangerous since users are exposed from day zero until the day a vendor
> prepares a patch and notifies users it is ready."
>
> http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/144803/chinese_blogs_detail_zeroday_flaw_in_microsoft_works.html
>
> Regards,
>
> n3td3v
>
I would actually add one more criteria. Not only would a 0day have no
patch available, but the vulnerability being exploited would not have
been previously announced. In other words, the very first exposure in
the wild of a 0day would be active exploitation of an "as of yet
unknown" (except of course by the exploit author) vulnerability. This
makes a true 0day all the more potent.

Cheers,

Doug

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Received on May 02 2008

[ Nmap | Sec Tools | Mailing Lists | Site News | About/Contact | Advertising | Privacy ]