mailing list archives
Re: security industry software license
From: M.B.Jr. <marcio.barbado () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:47:10 -0300
Any OSI-based set, but without enforcing security-through-obscurity concepts.
Maybe adapting some Bell-LaPadula ideas.
There are lots of models to discuss about. The real question however is:
can we start fresh?
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Buhrmaster, Gary <gtb () slac stanford edu> wrote:
* writing a whole new set of protocols to be used over a whole new
independent backbone infrastructure; and
I suggest the OSI protocol stack, for the security-through-obscurity
benefits. ASN.1, anybody? :)
I think the DMS was claimed to be more secure
since it was based on OSI.
Marcio Barbado, Jr.
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
Re: security industry software license M . B . Jr . (Oct 13)
Re: security industry software license wishi (Oct 21)
Re: security industry software license redb0ne (Oct 10)
Re: security industry software license Elazar Broad (Oct 16)
Re: security industry software license Kathib Karffi (Oct 18)