mailing list archives
Re: Software developer looks at CRU code
From: Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_lists () tx rr com>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:06:19 -0600
I'm going to assume this is a serious question.
You could start with the people enriching themselves off of carbon credits. Al
Gore, for one obvious example. You could continue with the people that think
the entire world should be ruled by a bureaucracy called the UN. You could go
on with the "scientists" who get millions of dollars worth of grants to "study"
the problem and propose solutions.
Are there people on the opposing side who benefit from what you call
scaremongering? Of course there are. But the claims of the global warming
crowd are unsupported by the data (not *their* data, because they have clearly
skewed it to support their claims, as is proven both by their emails and their
program code) but by the real data, unmassaged.
--On Monday, November 30, 2009 16:00:05 -0600 Rohit Patnaik
<quanticle () gmail com> wrote:
There's a question I ask whenever I hear a theory like this. Cui bono?
Who benefits? Who is benefiting from the "climate change scaremongering"?
You claim that trillions of dollars will need to be spent. If its such a
scam, then who is scamming us? The UN IPCC? A mysterious cabal of
alternative energy companies? The Trilateral Commission?
Paul Schmehl, Senior Infosec Analyst
As if it wasn't already obvious, my opinions
are my own and not those of my employer.
"It is as useless to argue with those who have
renounced the use of reason as to administer
medication to the dead." Thomas Jefferson
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/