----- Original Message -----
From: "Rohit Patnaik" <quanticle () gmail com>
To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] When is it valid to claim that a vulnerability leads to a remote attack?
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 22:32:49 -0500
Well, why are you relying on Thierry's clock to date your message?
Your e-mail client should use your local clock/mail server clock to
timestamp messages.
--Rohit Patnaik
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Chris <r0ck () operamail com> wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thierry Zoller" <Thierry () Zoller lu>
To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu, "Jonathan Leffler" <jleffler () us ibm com>
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] When is it valid to claim that a
vulnerability leads to a remote attack?
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:11:50 +0200
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Thierry, please fix your clock.
--
_______________________________________________
Surf the Web in a faster, safer and easier way:
Download Opera 9 at http://www.opera.com
Powered by Outblaze
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
