|
Full Disclosure
mailing list archives
Re: Expired certificate
From: Leif Nixon <nixon () nsc liu se>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:29:58 +0200
"Elazar Broad" <elazar () hushmail com> writes:
<snip>
Can't you? The world is full of unpatched systems. You can even find
systems where patches are not installed because it is running a
piece of
mission critical software and they would lose support if they
installed
any patches (I am not making this up).
</snip>
Spot on. I know of one large accounting/ERP system(which shall
remain nameless, though I am sure there are those out there who
have come across it) that checked the SQL version, including the
revision number at runtime, which made patching SQL impossible.
Or Gaussian:
http://gaussian.com/g09_plat.htm
"The Linux RedHat and SuSE versions specified for IA32, IA64 and
EM64T/Operton systems refer only to the unmodified, unpatched original
media/ISO image distributions as released by the vendor."
--
/ Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing
Leif Nixon - Security officer < National Supercomputer Centre
\ Nordic Data Grid Facility
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
By Date
By Thread
Current thread:
|