On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Graham Gower <graham.gower () gmail com> wrote:
On 15 December 2010 12:05, musnt live <musntlive () gmail com> wrote:
Original e-mail is from Theo DeRaadt
Is my question: "Why is now Theo cower like rat." Is because his
stance from the beginning: "we is audit everything" for make me
believe Theo was is also on the payroll. Enjoy everyone.
I have no idea what you're talking about here. Theo has always been
pragmatic regards security. He could easily have ignored this mail,
but decided to make it public in the spirit of full disclosure.
It seems like a difficult task to flat out deny that a backdoor was
inserted, given the circumstances. So he's probably just taking the
opportunity to get more eyeballs on the code, which will be positive
regardless of whether backdoor(s) are found.
-Graham
It is for no difficult task in this him to do so. By Theo disclosing
is this email he is take pre-emptive strike in this that the event for
if he no say anything this original author come forward and say: "I is
told you so, Theo is know all along"
Is you no familiar with this is OpenBSD, OpenBSD is for too highly
audited code especially from Theo. You is cannot is have is this two
way:
"We are ultra secure and we audit everysing including our babushka's panties"
and
"We is not know, for is to maybe we is should audit this now"
